van den Heuvel, R., Braun, S., de Bruin, M., & Daniëls, R. 2021. A Closer Look at Living Labs and Higher Education using a Scoping Review. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(9/10): 30-40. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1463

De Vita, K., & De Vita, R. 2021. Expect the Unexpected: Investigating co-creation projects in a Living Lab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(9/10): 6-20. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1461

De Witte, N. A. J., Broeckx, L., Vermeylen, S., Van Der Auwera, V., & Van Daele, T. 2021. Human Factors in Living Lab Research. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(9/10): 21-29. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1462

Huang, J. Hong, & Thomas, E. 2021. A Review of Living Lab Research and Methods for User Involvement. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(9/10): 88-107. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1467

Habibipour, A., Lindberg, J., Runardotter, M., Elmistikawy, Y., Ståhlbröst, A., & Chronéer, D. 2021. Rural Living Labs: Inclusive Digital Transformation in the Countryside. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(9/10): 59-72. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1465

Haukipuro, L., Väinämö, S., Arhippainen, L., & Ojala, T. 2019. Applying a Living Lab Approach Within an eHealth Accelerator. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(3): 6-19. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1221

Tanev, S., & Sandstrom, G. 2019. Editorial: Celebrating Innovation in Florence (October 2019). Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(10): 3-4

Callari, T. C., Moody, L., Saunders, J., Ward, G., Holliday, N., & Woodley, J. 2019. Exploring Participation Needs and Motivational Requirements When Engaging Older Adults in an Emerging Living Lab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(3): 38-49. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1223

von Geibler, J., Piwowar, J., & Greven, A. 2019. The SDG-Check: Guiding Open Innovation towards Sustainable Development Goals. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(3): 20-37. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1222

Chronéer, D., Ståhlbröst, A., & Habibipour, A. 2019. Urban Living Labs: Towards an Integrated Understanding of their Key Components. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(3): 50-62. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1224

Claudel, M. 2018. From Organizations to Organizational Fields: The Evolution of Civic Innovation Ecosystems. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(6): 34-47. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1163

Haukipuro, L., Väinämö, S., & Hyrkäs, P. 2018. Innovation Instruments to Co-Create Needs-Based Solutions in a Living Lab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(5): 22-35. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1156

Vilariño, F., Karatzas, D., & Valcarce, A. 2018. The Library Living Lab: A Collaborative Innovation Model for Public Libraries. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(12): 17-25. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1202

Schuurman, D., & Protic, S. M. 2018. Living Labs versus Lean Startups: An Empirical Investigation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(12): 7-16. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1201

Habibipour, A., Georges, A., Ståhlbröst, A., Schuurman, D., & Bergvall-Kåreborn, B. 2018. A Taxonomy of Factors Influencing Drop-Out Behaviour in Living Lab Field Tests. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(5): 5-21. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1155

Westerlund, M., Leminen, S., & Rajahonka, M. 2018. A Topic Modelling Analysis of Living Labs Research. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(7): 40-51. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1170

Logghe, S., & Schuurman, D. 2017. Action Research as a Framework to Evaluate the Operations of a Living Lab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(2): 35-41. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1056

Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. 2017. Categorization of Innovation Tools in Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(1): 15-25. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1046

Brankaert, R., & Ouden, Eden. 2017. The Design-Driven Living Lab: A New Approach to Exploring Solutions to Complex Societal Challenges. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(1): 44-51. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1049

Pedell, S., Keirnan, A., Priday, G., Miller, T., Mendoza, A., Lopez-Lorca, A., et al. 2017. Methods for Supporting Older Users in Communicating Their Emotions at Different Phases of a Living Lab Project. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(2): 7-19. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1053

Savelkoul, L., & Peutz, M. 2017. Needsfinding in Living Labs: A Structured Research Approach. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(2): 42-51. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1057

Ståhlbröst, A., & Holst, M. 2017. Reflecting on Actions in Living Lab Research. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(2): 27-34. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1055

Coorevits, L., & Jacobs, A. 2017. Taking Real-Life Seriously: An Approach to Decomposing Context Beyond “Environment” in Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(1): 26-36. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1047

Leminen, S., Rajahonka, M., & Westerlund, M. 2017. Towards Third-Generation Living Lab Networks in Cities. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(11): 21-35. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1118

Hakkarainen, L., & Hyysalo, S. 2016. The Evolution of Intermediary Activities: Broadening the Concept of Facilitation in Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(1): 45-58. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/960