Enhancing Early Innovation in an Urban Living Lab: Lessons from Espoo, Finland. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(1): 17-26. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/957
2016. 
Entrepreneurial Growth Ambitions: The Case of Finnish Technology Startups. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(10): 5-16. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1023
2016. 
The Evolution of Intermediary Activities: Broadening the Concept of Facilitation in Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(1): 45-58. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/960
2016. 
Examining the Modes Malware Suppliers Use to Provide Goods and Services. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(2): 21-27. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/965
2016. 
Factors Affecting the Attrition of Test Users During Living Lab Field Trials. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(1): 35-44. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/959
2016. 
A Framework for Sustainable Circular Business Model Innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(7): 5-12. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1000
2016. 
Governing Quintuple Helix Innovation: Urban Living Labs and Socio-Ecological Entrepreneurship. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(3): 22-30. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/972
2016. 
The Impact of Living Lab Methodology on Open Innovation Contributions and Outcomes. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(1): 7-16. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/956
2016. 
Implementing Knowledge Translation Strategies in Funded Research in Canada and Australia: A Case Study. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(9): 16-27. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1016
2016. 
Innovation Rhetoric and Reality: An Introduction to the TIM Review's Special Issue on Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Australia. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(6): 5-10. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/992
2016. 
Insights from Stimulating Creative Behaviours in a Project-Based Organization Team. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(4): 26-33. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/979
2016. 
Integrating Open Innovation Platforms in Public Sector Decision Making: Empirical Results from Smart City Research. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(12): 38-48. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1040
2016. 
Intrusion Learning: An Overview of an Emergent Discipline. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(2): 15-20. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/964
2016. 
License Compliance in Open Source Cybersecurity Projects. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(2): 28-35. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/966
2016. 
Managing Innovation Ecosystems to Create and Capture Value in ICT Industries. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(10): 17-24. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1024
2016. 
Mobilizing Knowledge: The Evidence Gap for Assistive Devices. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(9): 39-45. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1018
2016. 
Open Innovation in Indian Organizations: Types of Collaboration. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(5): 15-23. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/987
2016. 
Outcomes from Applying Design-Led Innovation in an Australian Manufacturing Firm. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(6): 49-58. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/997
2016. 
A Pattern-Based Approach to the Development of Frugal Innovations. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(3): 13-21. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/971
2016. 
Perspectives on Knowledge Mobilization: An Introduction to the Special Issue. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(9): 4-8. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1014
. 2016. 
Priority Systems at Theme Parks from the Perspective of Managers and Customers. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(11): 40-47. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1034
2016. 
A Process for Co-Creating Shared Value with the Crowd: Tourism Case Studies from a Regional Innovation System in Western Switzerland. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(11): 32-39. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1033
2016. 
Profiling Regional Innovation Ecosystems as Functional Collaborative Systems: The Case of Cambridge. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(12): 6-25. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1038
2016. 
A Proposed Approach for Idea Selection in Front End of Innovation Activities. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(8): 48-55. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1011
2016. 
Q&A. How Can a University Drive an Open Innovation Ecosystem?. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(7): 48-51. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1004
2016. 