2016. Factors Affecting the Attrition of Test Users During Living Lab Field Trials. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(1): 35-44. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/959
2016. Urban Living Labs for Sustainability in Suburbs in Need of Modernization and Social Uplift. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(1): 27-34. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/958
2015. Cities as Collaborative Innovation Platforms. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(10): 16-23. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/933
2015. The City as Living Laboratory: Empowering Citizens with the Citadel Toolkit. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(3): 6-17. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/877
2015. The Grey Areas Between Open and Closed in Innovation Networks. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(12): 6-18. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/948
2015. Leveraging Living Lab Innovation Processes through Crowdsourcing. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(12): 28-36. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/950
2015. Places and Spaces within Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(12): 37-47. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/951
2013. Coordination and Participation in Living Lab Networks. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(11): 5-14. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/740
2013. Linking Living Lab Characteristics and Their Outcomes: Towards a Conceptual Framework. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(12): 6-15. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/748
2013. A Living Lab as a Service: Creating Value for Micro-enterprises through Collaboration and Innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(11): 37-42. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/744
2012. A Small-Firm Perspective on the Benefits of Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9): 44-49. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/608
2011. Managing the Challenges of Becoming an Open Innovation Company: Experiences from Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 1(1): 19-25. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/489
]