Export 69 results:
Author Title Type [ Year
Filters: Keyword is Open innovation [Clear All Filters]
Expect the Unexpected: Investigating co-creation projects in a Living Lab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(9/10): 6-20. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1461
2021. 
Living Labs for Public Sector Innovation: insights from a European case study. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(9/10): 47-58. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1464
2021. 
Agile New Solution Development in Manufacturing Companies. Technology Innovation Management Review, 10(3): 16-24
2020. 
Applying a Living Lab Approach Within an eHealth Accelerator. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(3): 6-19. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1221
2019. 
Editorial: Living Labs (March 2019). Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(3): 3-5. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1220
2019. 
The SDG-Check: Guiding Open Innovation towards Sustainable Development Goals. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(3): 20-37. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1222
2019. 
Editorial: Inclusive Innovation in Developed Countries (February 2018). Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(2): 3-6. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1134
2018. 
Editorial: Insights (March 2018). Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(3): 3-4. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1141
2018. 
Editorial: Insights (October 2018). Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(10): 3-4. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1188
2018. 
Exploring the Use of Stakeholder Analysis Methodology in the Establishment of a Living Lab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(12): 26-39. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1203
. 2018. 
From Closed to Open Innovation in Emerging Economies: Evidence from the Chemical Industry in Brazil. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(3): 26-37. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1144
2018. 
How to Deal With and Repair Broken Trust in an R&D Partnership. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(9): 4-15. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1182
2018. 
Living Labs versus Lean Startups: An Empirical Investigation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(12): 7-16. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1201
2018. 
Tread Carefully: Managing Identities and Expectations in High-Tech Industry–Academia Collaborations. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(10): 29-43. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1191
2018. 
Categorization of Innovation Tools in Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(1): 15-25. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1046
2017. 
Editorial: Innovation in Living Labs (January 2017). Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(1): 3-6. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1044
2017. 
Editorial: Insights (November 2017). Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(11): 3-4. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1115
2017. 
Innovation in the Public Sector: Exploring the Characteristics and Potential of Living Labs and Innovation Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(1): 7-14. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1045
2017. 
Q&A. How Do Digital Platforms for Ideas, Technologies, and Knowledge Transfer Act as Enablers for Digital Transformation?. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(9): 55-60. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1106
. 2017. 
Towards Third-Generation Living Lab Networks in Cities. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(11): 21-35. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1118
2017. 
Editorial: Entrepreneurial India (May 2016). Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(5): 3-4. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/984
2016. 
Editorial: Insights (July 2016). Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(7): 3-4. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/999
2016. 
Editorial: Living Labs and User Innovation (January 2016). Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(1): 3-6. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/955
2016. 
Editorial: Managing Innovation (April 2016). Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(4): 3-4. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/976
2016. 
Editorial: Smart Cities and Regions (December 2016). Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(12): 3-5. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1037
2016. 