Blezer, S., & Abujidi, N. 2021. Urban Living Labs and Transformative Changes: A qualitative study of the triadic relationship between financing, stakeholder roles, and the outcomes of Urban Living Labs in terms of impact creation in the city of Groningen, the Netherlands. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(9/10): 73-87. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1466

McPhee, C., Ståhlbröst, A., Habibipour, A., Runardotter, M., & Chronéer, D. 2019. Editorial: Living Labs (March 2019). Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(3): 3-5. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1220

Steen, K., & van Bueren, E. 2017. The Defining Characteristics of Urban Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(7): 21-33. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1088

Baccarne, B., Logghe, S., Schuurman, D., & De Marez, L. 2016. Governing Quintuple Helix Innovation: Urban Living Labs and Socio-Ecological Entrepreneurship. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(3): 22-30. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/972

Franz, Y., Tausz, K., & Thiel, S. - K. 2015. Contextuality and Co-Creation Matter: A Qualitative Case Study Comparison of Living Lab Concepts in Urban Research. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(12): 48-55. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/952

McPhee, C., Leminen, S., Schuurman, D., Westerlund, M., & Huizingh, E. 2015. Editorial: Living Labs and User Innovation (December 2015). Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(12): 3-5. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/947

Juujärvi, S., & Pesso, K. 2013. Actor Roles in an Urban Living Lab: What Can We Learn from Suurpelto, Finland?. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(11): 22-27. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/742