Export 21 results:
Author Title Type [ Year
] Filters: Author is Dimitri Schuurman [Clear All Filters]
2021. Editorial: Living Labs (9/10, 2021). Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(9/10): 3-5. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1460
2019. Innovation Management in Living Lab Projects: The Innovatrix Framework. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(3): 63-73. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1225
2018. Editorial: Living Labs (December 2018). Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(12): 3-6. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1200
2018. A Framework for Field Testing in Living Lab Innovation Projects. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(12): 40-50. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1204
2018. Living Labs versus Lean Startups: An Empirical Investigation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(12): 7-16. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1201
2018. A Taxonomy of Factors Influencing Drop-Out Behaviour in Living Lab Field Tests. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(5): 5-21. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1155
2017. Action Research as a Framework to Evaluate the Operations of a Living Lab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(2): 35-41. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1056
2017. Editorial: Innovation in Living Labs (February 2017). Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(2): 3-6. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1052
2017. Editorial: Innovation in Living Labs (January 2017). Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(1): 3-6. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1044
2017. Innovation in the Public Sector: Exploring the Characteristics and Potential of Living Labs and Innovation Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(1): 7-14. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1045
2017. Overcoming Barriers to Experimentation in Business-to-Business Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(2): 20-26. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1054
2017. A Structured Approach to Academic Technology Transfer: Lessons Learned from imec’s 101 Programme. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(8): 5-14. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1095
2016. Editorial: Living Labs and User Innovation (January 2016). Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(1): 3-6. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/955
2016. Factors Affecting the Attrition of Test Users During Living Lab Field Trials. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(1): 35-44. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/959
2016. Governing Quintuple Helix Innovation: Urban Living Labs and Socio-Ecological Entrepreneurship. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(3): 22-30. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/972
2016. The Impact of Living Lab Methodology on Open Innovation Contributions and Outcomes. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(1): 7-16. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/956
2015. Editorial: Living Labs and User Innovation (December 2015). Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(12): 3-5. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/947
2015. Exploring the Benefits of Integrating Business Model Research within Living Lab Projects. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(12): 19-27. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/949
2013. Linking Living Lab Characteristics and Their Outcomes: Towards a Conceptual Framework. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(12): 6-15. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/748
2013. Open Innovation Processes in Living Lab Innovation Systems: Insights from the LeYLab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(11): 28-36. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/743
2012. Structuring User Involvement in Panel-Based Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9): 31-38. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/606