<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lotta Haukipuro</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Satu Väinämö</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Leena Arhippainen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Timo Ojala</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Applying a Living Lab Approach Within an eHealth Accelerator</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">accelerator</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">case study</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ehealth</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Living lab</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SME</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">startup</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2019</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">03/2019</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://timreview.ca/article/1221</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6-19</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Through this study, we seek to understand the impact of the use of the living lab approach on product and business development in an eHealth accelerator. In the case accelerator, 20 startups developed innovative products atop the European FIWARE Future Internet technology platform. The novel design element of the case accelerator was the use of the living lab approach that was included for the purpose of engaging end users in the development and testing of new product prototypes. Our main result is that the living lab approach provided added value to participating companies and resulted in changes in their product development and marketing strategies. Overall, the case accelerator and the use of the living lab approach had a significant impact on the development, growth, and market success of the companies. Based on the results of the case accelerator, we propose the generic accelerator model presented by Pauwels and co-authors in 2016 to be extended with a new design element, the living lab approach. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Oulu
Lotta Haukipuro is a Coordinator of the project “Generation Z and Beyond: Co-Evolution of Human Capabilities and Intelligent Technologies in the 21st Century (GenZ)” in the Faculty of Humanities at the University of Oulu, Finland. She received her doctorate degree in 2019 from Oulu Business School. Her research has focused on user involvement through the living lab approach in different contexts. Since 2011, she has worked in several national and international RDI projects related to living labs and user involvement.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Oulu
Satu Väinämö is a User Research Expert and Program Manager at the University of Oulu in Finland. She has comprehensive experience of leading international projects, managing and creating user interface designs, and defining innovation processes. Her career includes over 15 years in the ICT industry in several leadership and user-experience design positions. She has led more than 100 development activities within Oulu Urban Living Labs. She is currently in charge of establishing a Digital Health Knowledge Hub in Oulu.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Oulu
Leena Arhippainen is a Postdoctoral Researcher and Teacher in the Faculty of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, INTERACT Research Unit at the University of Oulu, Finland. Leena received her Master’s degree in the Department of Information Processing Science at University of Oulu in 2002 and her PhD degree in 2009. Her research interests include user experience, UX methods, human-computer interaction, 3D user interfaces and virtual environments, user involvement, and living labs.</style></custom3><custom4><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Oulu
Timo Ojala is a Professor of Computer Science and Engineering and Director of the Center for Ubiquitous Computing at the University of Oulu, Finland. He obtained his doctorate degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Oulu in 1997. His research activities have included living lab studies of ubiquitous computing and virtual reality systems in real-world urban settings. He is a member of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM).</style></custom4></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kristina Lukosiute</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Søren Jensen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Stoyan Tanev</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Is Joining a Business Incubator or Accelerator Always a Good Thing?</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">accelerator</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Canada</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Denmark</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">disadvantages</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">incubator</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lithuania</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">new venture</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">start-up</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2019</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">07/2019</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://timreview.ca/article/1251</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5-15</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Business incubators and accelerators are often hailed as essential tools for fostering growth in startups. However, not only do entrepreneurs often face the question of which incubator or accelerator to join, we suggest that they should also question whether or not to join one at all. Is joining a business incubator or accelerator always a good thing? In this article, we investigate some of the negative outcomes entrepreneurs can experience when engaging with an incubator or accelerator. We apply a cross-case analysis of empirical observations from qualitative interviews with Danish and Canadian entrepreneurs to arrive at a set of recommendations that entrepreneurs should keep in mind when considering such an engagement. These points are further qualified based on informal interviews with four serial entrepreneurs.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">7</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Southern Denmark
Kristina Lukosiute is a business and innovation practitioner helping new companies articulate viable business models and competitive marketing strategies. She holds an MSc in Engineering Product Development and Innovation from the University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark, and the present article is based on her thesis work. </style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Southern Denmark
Søren Jensen is an Associate Professor in the Faculty of Engineering at the University of Southern Denmark. Previously, he worked in a seed-financing company analyzing technology business ideas. As an investment analyst, his special interests lay within intellectual property and technology assessment. He now teaches intellectual property and entrepreneurial business understanding. </style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Stoyan Tanev, PhD, MSc, MEng, MA, is Associate Professor of Technology Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management associated with the Technology Innovation Management (TIM) Program and Sprott School of Business at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. Before re-joining Carleton University, Dr. Tanev was part of the Innovation and Design Engineering Section in the Faculty of Engineering at the University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense, Denmark. Dr. Tanev has a multidisciplinary background including an MSc in Physics (Sofia University, Bulgaria), a PhD in Physics (1995, University Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris, France, co-awarded by Sofia University, Bulgaria), an MEng in Technology Management (2005, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada), an MA in Orthodox Theology (2009, University of Sherbrooke, Montreal Campus, QC, Canada), and a PhD in Theology (2012, Sofia University, Bulgaria). Dr. Tanev’s current research interests are in the fields of technology entrepreneurship and innovation management, design principles and growth modes of global technology startups, business analytics, and data/text mining. He also has an interest in interdisciplinary epistemological issues on the interface of philosophy of religion, Orthodox theology, and the natural and social sciences.
</style></custom3></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tony Bailetti</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sonia D. Bot</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">An Ecosystem-Based Job-Creation Engine Fuelled by Technology Entrepreneurs</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">accelerator</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">economic development</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">entrepreneur</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">incubator</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">job creation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lead To Win</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">startups</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">technology entrepreneurship</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">02/2013</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/658</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">31-40</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Job creation is at the centre of the rationale provided by governments and publicly funded organizations for investing in services purported to support entrepreneurs to launch and grow technology startups. However, little is known about how to design and build the engines that convert these publicly funded services into jobs in a region. In this article, we argue that the architecture of a job-creation engine fuelled by technology entrepreneurs is important and that it should be made visible to the stakeholders of a regional venture system. The manner in which the components of a job-creation engine are organized and integrated determines the effectiveness and efficiency of the conversion of public funds into jobs. Making visible the architecture of a job-creation engine enables individuals and organizations to: i) better understand the link between the investment made to service technology entrepreneurs and systematic job creation; ii) utilize the regional venture system more effectively; and iii) set the performance benchmark for capability improvement and rapid adjustment to environmental changes. The experience gained from operating Lead To Win since 2009 is used to describe the architecture of a job-creation engine fuelled by technology entrepreneurs that operate in Canada’s Capital Region. Lead To Win is an ecosystem designed to help a technology venture generate sufficient revenue to create six or more knowledge jobs in the region within three years of inception. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University
Tony Bailetti is an Associate Professor in the Sprott School of Business and the Department of Systems and Computer Engineering at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. Professor Bailetti is the Director of Carleton University's Technology Innovation Management (&lt;a href=&quot;http://carleton.ca/tim&quot;&gt;TIM&lt;/a&gt;) program. His research, teaching, and community contributions support technology entrepreneurship, regional economic development, and international co-innovation.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lead To Win Council
Sonia Bot is an entrepreneurial-minded leader/executive and strategic thinker with extensive experience in technology innovation and global business management. She specializes in new venture creation, product management and delivery, business transformation and strategy, and leading organizational change. She is an accomplished industry presenter, author of numerous peer-reviewed published articles, and industry executive member of the Technology Entrepreneurship &amp; Commercialization Council at Carleton University. Ms. Bot currently partners with executives and entrepreneurs of small-medium enterprises and large entrepreneurial companies to assist in building, growing, and transforming new ventures and to solve wicked business problems. Her prior work experience includes Research In Motion / BlackBerry, Nortel, Bell-Northern Research, IBM, and TransCanada Pipelines. She holds degrees in Computer Science with Systems Design / Electrical Engineering (BMath) from the University of Waterloo and Biomedical Engineering (MASc) from the University of Toronto, and she is a certified Lean Six Sigma Master Black Belt. In November 2012, Ms. Bot received the honour of &quot;Innovators &amp; Entrepreneurs&quot; by the Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering at the University of Toronto. </style></custom2></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Diane A. Isabelle</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Key Factors Affecting a Technology Entrepreneur's Choice of Incubator or Accelerator</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">accelerator</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">entrepreneur</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">incubator</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">technology entrepreneurship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">venture</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">02/2013</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/656</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">16-22</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology entrepreneurship rarely succeeds in isolation; increasingly, it occurs in interconnected networks of business partners and other organizations. For entrepreneurs lacking access to an established business ecosystem, incubators and accelerators provide a possible support mechanism for access to partners and resources. Yet, these relatively recent approaches to supporting entrepreneurship are still evolving. Therefore, it can be challenging for entrepreneurs to assess these mechanisms and to make insightful decisions on whether or not to join an incubator or accelerator, and which incubator or accelerator best meets their needs.

In this article, five key factors that entrepreneurs should take into consideration about incubators and accelerators are offered. Insights are drawn from two surveys of managers and users of incubators and accelerators. An understanding of these five key success factors (stage of venture, fit with incubator’s mission, selection and graduation policies, services provided, and network of partners) and potential pitfalls will help entrepreneurs confidently enter into a relationship with an incubator or accelerator. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carleton University 
Diane Isabelle is a faculty member at Carleton University's Sprott School of Business, where she teaches marketing, entrepreneurship, and international business. She is also the principal of Diane Isabelle &amp; Associates Consultants. She was formerly the Executive Director to the Vice-President Physical Sciences at the National Research Council of Canada, and was for many years an Industrial Technology Advisor for NRC-Industrial Research Assistance Program (IRAP), supporting Canadian SMEs with the strategic use of innovation and business advice to compete on the global scene. She holds a PhD in management, an MBA, and an undergraduate engineering degree. Her areas of expertise include: technology entrepreneurship; strategic planning and foresight; and national and international initiatives in science and technology. Her research interests include: international collaborations, national innovation systems, science and technology commercialization, and other topics related to technology entrepreneurship and innovation management. She is the author of publications and communications in the field of innovation.</style></custom1></record></records></xml>