<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Karlos Artto</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Riikka Kyrö</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tuomas Ahola</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Antti Peltokorpi</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kristiina Sandqvist</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Cuckoo’s Nest Approach for Co-Creating Business Ecosystems in Smart Cities</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">business ecosystem</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">business network</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">campus development</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">co-creation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">co-design</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">collective action</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cuckoo’s Nest Approach</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">participatory planning</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">smart cities</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">sustainability</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">12/2016</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/1039</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">26-37</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The development of business ecosystems in smart cities is currently hampered by the absence of established approaches for facilitating long-term value and sustainability. In our view, the underlying reason is the lack of collective action involving various organizations in the design process. Collective action for the good of the whole ecosystem does not take place in existing participatory practices because of the dominating role of a single customer or designer organization (in urban development projects typically the owner-developer or lead architect), who uses their bargaining and decision-making power over others. This leads to sub-optimal behaviour where the system is optimized for the goals of one strong organization instead of collectively developed system-level goals of the business ecosystem as a whole. The Cuckoo’s Nest approach addresses this problem by inviting various expert organizations to design the system and assigning each organization design rights for the ecosystem and its system-level goal. The Cuckoo’s Nest approach enhances collective action among the organizations by making individuals from various organizations consider the interests, goals, objectives, and value-adding elements of other organizations – not just those of their own organizations. With the Cuckoo’s Nest approach, the business ecosystem comes first, and single organizations’ goals or specific design features come second. This article discusses the outcomes of two workshops where the Cuckoo’s Nest approach was used for the purpose of developing business ecosystems in connection with smart city development projects within the Helsinki Metropolitan Area. We outline the steps involved in the Cuckoo’s Nest approach and how they were applied in these two smart city projects, and we describe how it is being refined for further use in other locations and contexts.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">12</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Aalto University
Karlos Artto is a Professor and Lead of Project Business at Aalto University, Helsinki, Finland. Dr. Artto’s long experience working in industry and the multiple research projects he conducted with global firms and domestic organizations provide a strong empirical basis for his academic achievements. His publications include more than 50 articles in refereed journals and more than 200 academic papers, book chapters, and books on project business and the management of project-based firms. He belongs to editorial boards of several project management journals. Dr. Artto has supervised 12 doctoral dissertations and more than 180 master’s theses.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Aalto University
Riikka Kyrö is a Postdoctoral Researcher at Aalto University School of Science, Finland. Dr. Kyrö earned an M Sc in Real Estate Economics in 2005 from the Helsinki University of Technology and a DrSc (Tech) in Real Estate Business in 2013 from the Aalto University School of Engineering. Outside academia, she has six years of industry experience working with environmental consulting and sustainability in corporate real estate management. Dr. Kyrö has published nearly 30 academic articles in the field of the built environment.</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tampere University of Technology
Tuomas Ahola is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Industrial Management at the Tampere University of Technology, Finland, as well as an Adjunct Professor of Project Management at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology. Dr. Ahola specializes in inter-organizational networks in the context of project business. He has published more than 15 peer-reviewed journal articles. Dr. Ahola lectures on various content areas of project business for both academic and industry audiences.</style></custom3><custom4><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Aalto University
Antti Peltokorpi is an Assistant Professor of Operations Management in Construction at Aalto University School of Engineering, Finland. Dr. Peltokorpi holds a DrSc (Tech) in Operations Management from the Aalto University School of Science. His research includes studies on service innovations, service production strategies, and production planning and control. Dr. Peltokorpi's research interests include value creation in business networks and supply chains, especially in the built environment, the construction industry, and healthcare.</style></custom4><custom5><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Aalto University
Kristiina Sandqvist is a MA student in Collaborative and Industrial Design at Aalto University School of Arts, Design and Architecture in Finland. Ms. Sandqvist has industry experience as a service designer and is interested in the development and application of co-creation methods as well as the emerging roles of designers as facilitators.</style></custom5></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Louna Hakkarainen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sampsa Hyysalo</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Evolution of Intermediary Activities: Broadening the Concept of Facilitation in Living Labs</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">co-design</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">elderly care</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">facilitation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">health technology</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">innovation intermediaries</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Living lab</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">01/2016</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/960</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">45-58</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Innovation intermediaries play an important role in open innovation endeavours. In living lab projects, where different professional identities and organizational cultures are at play, intermediary actors facilitate learning between stakeholders and manage tensions and conflicts of interest. The current living lab literature recognizes the importance and multifacetedness of these actors, but does not shed light on the work they do at a more practical level. Our study seeks to capture the variety and evolution of work tasks of user-side innovation intermediaries during and after a four-year technology project in a living lab. The study explores how these mediating actors tackle the everyday challenges of a living lab project. This article is grounded on a longitudinal qualitative case study of a innovation process for a floor monitoring system for elderly care – the &quot;smart floor&quot;. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Aalto University
Louna Hakkarainen, Lic.Soc.Sc., is a doctoral candidate in the School of Art, Design and Architecture of Aalto University in Helsinki, Finland. She holds a licentiate degree from the University of Helsinki’s Faculty of Social Sciences. Her research focuses on social shaping of technology, living lab collaboration, and facilitation.</style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Aalto University
Sampsa Hyysalo is an Associate Professor in Co-Design at the Aalto University School of Art, Design and Architecture and a Senior Researcher at the Aalto University School of Economics in Helsinki, Finland. Sampsa’s research and teaching focus on user involvement in innovation and the co-evolution of technologies, practices and organizations. He received his PhD in Behavioral Sciences from the University of Helsinki and holds a Docentship in Information Systems, specialising in user-centred design. </style></custom2></record></records></xml>