<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kamal Sakhdari</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Corporate Entrepreneurship: A Review and Future Research Agenda</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">corporate entrepreneurship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">established firms</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">strategic renewal</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">venturing</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">08/2016</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/1007</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5-18</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The overarching theme of corporate entrepreneurship literature is to understand why some firms are able to generate higher levels of corporate entrepreneurship than others. While the extant literature has greatly advanced our understanding of entrepreneurial activities by established firms, less effort has been made to systematically review the literature to help us identify missing links and knowledge in prior studies. To address this gap, this article critically reviews previous important studies on corporate entrepreneurship and then develops a framework integrating previous research. Finally, the article suggests five potentially worthwhile avenues for future research.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Tehran
Kamal Sakhdari is an Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Entrepreneurship at the University of Tehran, Iran. He received his PhD in Business and Entrepreneurship from the Queensland University of Technology (QUT) in Brisbane, Australia. His main research interests are corporate entrepreneurship, innovation management, institutional theory, and international business. He is also a member of the Australian Centre for Entrepreneurship Research (ACE) at the QUT Business School.</style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kamal Sakhdari</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Erfan Jalali Bidakhavidi</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Underground Innovation: How to Encourage Bootlegging Employees to Disclose Their Good Ideas</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">bootlegging</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">corporate entrepreneurship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">hidden ideas</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">innovation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">qualitative research method</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">R&amp;D departments</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">03/2016</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/970</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5-12</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Employees are increasingly considered as the origin of many corporate entrepreneurial ideas. Research on “bootlegging” posits that individuals often resort to hidden activities to elaborate their initial ideas and bring them to fruition. The origins and causes of bootlegging behaviour are well argued in the literature. Yet, less is known about what drives bootleggers to uncover their hidden ideas. This research uses field data from in-depth interviews with innovators in R&amp;D departments in different industries of Iran to identify factors stimulating bootleggers to reveal their underground ideas. We identified five groups of factors at individual, managerial, firm, industrial, and idea levels, explaining the revealing stage of bootlegging behaviour. The findings provide a better understanding of the later phases of bootlegging behaviour and the possible role of context-specific factors such as cultural and religious beliefs.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Tehran
Kamal Sakhdari is an Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Entrepreneurship at the University of Tehran, Iran. He received his PhD in Business and Entrepreneurship from the Queensland University of Technology (QUT) in Brisbane, Australia. His main research interests are corporate entrepreneurship, innovation management, institutional theory, and international business. He is also a member of the Australian Centre for Entrepreneurship Research (ACE) at the QUT Business School. </style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">University of Tehran
Erfan Jalali Bidakhavidi holds a Master's degree in Entrepreneurship from the Faculty of Entrepreneurship at the University of Tehran, Iran. His main research interests are corporate entrepreneurship, innovation management, and organizational behaviour. He has been working in the telecommunication industry for several years, and is now conducting a research project on bootlegging behaviour focusing on cultural and institutional factors.</style></custom2></record></records></xml>