<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Louna Hakkarainen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sampsa Hyysalo</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">How Do We Keep the Living Laboratory Alive? Learning and Conflicts in Living Lab Collaboration</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technology Innovation Management Review</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">collaboration</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">conflicts</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">gerontechnology</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">health care</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">learning</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">living labs</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">12/2013</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://timreview.ca/article/749</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Talent First Network</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ottawa</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">16-22</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Living lab environments are often promoted as a way to engage private companies, citizens, researchers, and public organizations in mutually beneficial learning. Based on an in-depth case study of a four-year living lab collaboration in gerontechnology, we agree that successful living lab development hinges on learning between the parties, yet its emergence cannot be presumed or taken for granted. Diverse competences and interests of participating actors often make technology development projects complicated and volatile. The study describes two specific challenges faced in a living lab project: i) power issues between the actors and ii) end-user reluctance to participate in the development of new technology. Despite the hardships, we suggest that the living lab environment worked as a catalyst for learning between users and developers. Nevertheless, realizing the benefits of this learning may be more challenging than is usually expected. Learning for interaction is needed before effective learning in interaction is possible.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">12</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Aalto University
Louna Hakkarainen, M.Soc.Sci, is a Doctoral candidate in the School of Arts, Design and Architecture at Aalto University in Helsinki, Finland. She is also finishing her licenciate degree in the University of Helsinki's Faculty of Social Sciences. Her research focuses on social shaping of technology, living lab development, and facilitation. </style></custom1><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Aalto University
Sampsa Hyysalo is an Associate Professor in Co-Design in Aalto University's School of Arts, Design and Architecture, and he is a Senior Researcher at the Aalto University School of Business in Helsinki, Finland. Sampsa’s research and teaching focus on user involvement in innovation and the co-evolution of technologies, practices, and organizations. He received his PhD in Behavioral Sciences from the University of Helsinki and holds a Docentship in information systems, specializing in user-centered design. Sampsa has published 30 peer-reviewed articles, and his most recent books are &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.routledge.com/books/details/9780415806466&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Health Technology Development and Use: From Practice-Bound Imagination to Evolving Impacts&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; (2010) and &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.taik.fi/kirjakauppa/images/bfee4ec00950ec8aaf7f96538f668055.pdf&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Käyttäjä Tuotekehityksessä—Tieto, Tutkimus, Menetelmät&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; (Users in Product Development—Knowledge, Research, Methods, 2009).</style></custom2></record></records></xml>