02147nas a2200325   4500008004100000022001400041245010100055210006900156260004200225300001000267490000600277520115600283653002001439653001101459653002601470653002501496653002701521653001601548653002301564653002001587653001901607653002401626653002701650653002201677653002401699653002301723100001801746700001901764856003801783       2019                        eng d  a1927-032100aEmbedded Master’s Students Conduct Highly Relevant Research Using Industry as Their Laboratory0 aEmbedded Master s Students Conduct Highly Relevant Research Usin  aOttawabTalent First Networkc05/2019  a54-730 v93 aThis article analyzes participatory action research conducted by Systems Engineering master’s students embedded fifty percent in industrial companies for three years. The resulting papers authored by these students identify challenges and effective practices suitable for knowledge transfer between industry and academia. The analysis covers 181 completed master’s projects, with a detailed analysis of 40 papers that have been published in international conferences and journals. The publication rate of about 23% shows that these students contribute actively to the body of Systems Engineering knowledge. This study analyzes master’s projects at three levels – industrial problem and drivers; Systems Engineering methods; and research method feasibility – and provides valuable lessons learned by applying the industry-as-laboratory approach. Embedding students in industry has resulted in publications that do not suffer from the main challenges of participatory research such as delays, repeatability, and only action and not research. These insights are valuable both for industry and for academia in future work to enhance innovations.10aaction research10aenergy10aexperimental learning10aindustrial knowledge10aindustry as laboratory10ainnovations10aknowledge transfer10alessons learned10amaster project10amaster’s students10aparticipatory research10asituated learning10asystems engineering10asystems of systems1 aFalk, Kristin1 aMuller, Gerrit  uhttps://timreview.ca/article/124100850nas a2200313   4500008004100000022001400041245006000055210005700115260004200172300000800214490000600222653001500228653000900243653001600252653001500268653001400283653002300297653000900320653001500329653001700344653002400361653001500385653003200400653001000432100001800442700002300460700001700483856003600500       2015                        eng d  a1927-032100aEditorial: Innovation Tools and Techniques (March 2015)0 aEditorial Innovation Tools and Techniques March 2015  aOttawabTalent First Networkc03/2015  a3-50 v510ainnovation10alean10aliving labs10amanagement10aprocesses10aproject management10arisk10asignalling10asmart cities10asystems engineering10atechniques10atechnology entrepreneurship10atools1 aMcPhee, Chris1 aGalbraith, Brendan1 aNoori, Nadia  uhttp://timreview.ca/article/87601687nas a2200277   4500008004100000022001400041245008000055210006900135260004200204300001000246490000600256520084300262653003001105653002101135653002601156653002301182653001801205653002401223653003401247100001801281700002201299700001301321700001901334700002001353856003601373       2015                        eng d  a1927-032100aA Method and Tool to Support the Management of Systems Engineering Projects0 aMethod and Tool to Support the Management of Systems Engineering  aOttawabTalent First Networkc03/2015  a18-280 v53 aToo many industrial projects still fail, mainly due to the managerial techniques used. Indeed, organizational processes are more or less specifically mentioned in systems engineering standards, but in practice, project managers tend to rely more on their own standards, which sometimes set forth practices that do not align with those of the systems engineering domain, hence the reported discrepancies that very often lead to project failure. Thus, we argue that, to improve the companies’ competitiveness when developing new products, cooperation between processes related to system development and project management is key to achieving performance and success. This article presents arguments that tend to support this assertion and introduces an ongoing project to develop both a method and tool that aim to integrate both domains.10acollaborative engineering10adecision support10aengineering processes10aproject management10asystem design10asystems engineering10asystems engineering standards1 aBaron, Claude1 aEsteban, Philippe1 aXue, Rui1 aEsteve, Daniel1 aMalbert, Michel  uhttp://timreview.ca/article/878