02224nas a2200253   4500008004100000022001400041245009200055210006900147260004200216300000900258490000700267520149800274653001501772653001501787653001201802653000801814653001701822653002001839653001001859100002301869700002601892700002201918856003001940       2020                        eng d  a1927-032100aTrust, Transparency and Security in the Sharing Economy: What is the Government's Role?0 aTrust Transparency and Security in the Sharing Economy What is t  aOttawabTalent First Networkc05/2020  a5-170 v103 aTo obtain access to goods or services between people or stakeholders, some collaboration between actors is a necessary component. Sharing and a sharing economy is closely related to trust. Within the context of 'the' sharing economy, especially digital trust is assumed to play a crucial role. Access to information is a crucial digital cue which can lead to trust yet, sharing economies are subject to asymmetry of information, wherein certain actors have limited access to market information on the consumption behaviour of users, the pricing of a product and, the reliability of peers. The lack of confidential market information between actors is thus limiting the potential for collaboration, as it reduces trust between them. Governments are amongst the (usually more trustworthy) candidates to undertake critical roles in enhancing the sharing of sensitive data. This paper aims to identify the role of government in facilitating and enabling data sharing between various actors in sharing economies. In this paper, we analyse the adequacy of a government's potential role in enabling transparency, trust and security, while operating within a sharing economy scenario, based on two case studies. Additionally, the role of technology is briefly defined for digital platforms and for blockchain-based opportunities for sharing economies. The use cases for the paper concern a digital platform for industrial symbioses, and peer-to-peer electricity trading based on blockchain technology.10ablockchain10agovernment10anetwork10aP2P10apeer-to-peer10asharing economy10atrust1 aD’Hauwers, Ruben1 avan der Bank, Jacobus1 aMontakhabi, Mehdi  utimreview.ca/article/135200663nas a2200241   4500008004100000022001400041245004100055210003800096260004200134300000800176490000600184653002200190653002300212653003000235653001100265653001800276653000900294653001700303653003500320653001000355100001800365856003800383       2018                        eng d  a1927-032100aEditorial: Insights (September 2018)0 aEditorial Insights September 2018  aOttawabTalent First Networkc09/2018  a3-30 v810acommercialization10aemerging economies10aentrepreneurial marketing10aexport10aglobalization10alean10apartnerships10atransnational entrepreneurship10atrust1 aMcPhee, Chris  uhttps://timreview.ca/article/118101516nas a2200205   4500008004100000022001400041245006700055210006600122260004200188300000900230490000600239520092400245653001301169653002001182653002101202653001001223653001701233100002201250856003801272       2018                        eng d  a1927-032100aHow to Deal With and Repair Broken Trust in an R&D Partnership0 aHow to Deal With and Repair Broken Trust in an RD Partnership  aOttawabTalent First Networkc09/2018  a4-150 v83 aThis article offers an actionable framework for dealing with trust violations in R&D partnerships: it explains how to turn around a conflicted R&D partnership, repair trust, and learn from the experience. As innovation becomes more open, firms increasingly find themselves involved in R&D collaborations with suppliers, customers or even competitors. Trust plays a fundamental role in such partnerships to work. Yet, trust cannot be taken for granted. In fact, trust in R&D partnerships is often violated – and without executive intervention, trust violations can soon turn even the most promising partnership into a value-destroying predicament. Although much has been written about trust formation in R&D partnerships, this article focuses instead on what to do when trust has been broken. The analysis is based on a review of academic research and is illustrated with real-life examples of trust repair processes. 10aconflict10aOpen innovation10aR&D partnerships10atrust10atrust repair1 aBrattström, Anna  uhttps://timreview.ca/article/118200745nas a2200289   4500008004100000022001400041245004100055210003800096260004200134300000800176490000600184653001900190653001200209653001500221653001700236653002100253653001400274653001500288653001900303653001300322653002000335653001700355653001000372100001800382700001800400856003700418       2017                        eng d  a1927-032100aEditorial: Blockchain (October 2017)0 aEditorial Blockchain October 2017  aOttawabTalent First Networkc10/2017  a3-50 v710aauthentication10aBitcoin10ablockchain10acryptography10adigital identity10aeconomics10ahealthcare10ainternal audit10aservices10asmart contracts10atransactions10atrust1 aMcPhee, Chris1 aLjutic, Anton  uhttp://timreview.ca/article/110801779nas a2200205   4500008004100000022001400041245010400055210006900159260004200228300001000270490000600280520114100286653001501427653002301442653001101465653002501476653001001501100002501511856003701536       2017                        eng d  a1927-032100aHitching Healthcare to the Chain: An Introduction to Blockchain Technology in the Healthcare Sector0 aHitching Healthcare to the Chain An Introduction to Blockchain T  aOttawabTalent First Networkc10/2017  a22-340 v73 aHealth services must balance patient care with information privacy, access, and completeness. The massive scale of the healthcare industry also amplifies the importance of cost control. The promise of blockchain technology in health services, combined with application layers built atop it, is to be a mechanism that provides utmost privacy while ensuring that appropriate users can easily add to and access a permanent record of information. Blockchains, also called distributed ledgers, enable a combination of cost reduction and increased accessibility to information by connecting stakeholders directly without requirements for third-party brokers, potentially giving better results at lower costs. New ventures are looking to apply blockchain technology to solve real-world problems, including efforts to track public health, centralize research data, monitor and fulfill prescriptions, lower administrative overheads, and organize patient data from an increasing number of inputs. Here, concrete examples of the application of blockchain technology in the health sector are described, touching on near-term promise and challenges.10ablockchain10adistributed ledger10ahealth10apatient-centred care10atrust1 aEngelhardt, Mark, A.  uhttp://timreview.ca/article/111101307nas a2200229   4500008004100000022001400041245010400055210006900159260004200228300001000270490000600280520063300286653001500919653000800934653001000942653002400952653001500976653002000991653001001011100001901021856003701040       2017                        eng d  a1927-032100aSmart Contract Relations in e-Commerce: Legal Implications of Exchanges Conducted on the Blockchain0 aSmart Contract Relations in eCommerce Legal Implications of Exch  aOttawabTalent First Networkc10/2017  a14-210 v73 aMuch of the discussion around blockchain-based smart contracts has focused on whether or not they operate in the same way as legal contracts. However, it is argued that most contracts are social rather than legal in nature and are entered into because the parties trust each other to perform the agreed exchange. Little has been written to address how the blockchain’s trust protocol can enable the kind of social contracting that characterized the way exchanges were conducted before the Internet. This article aims to fill that gap by exploring blockchain-based smart contracts primarily as non-contractual social exchanges.10ablockchain10alaw10alegal10aonline transactions10areputation10asmart contracts10atrust1 aRyan, Philippa  uhttp://timreview.ca/article/111000731nas a2200265   4500008004100000022001400041245006600055210006100121260004200182300001000224490000600234653001800240653002300258653000800281653001500289653001000304653001300314653001300327100001900340700001900359700001600378700001800394700001600412856003700428       2017                        eng d  a1927-032100aTIM Lecture Series – Building Trust in an IoT-Enabled World0 aTIM Lecture Series Building Trust in an IoTEnabled World  aOttawabTalent First Networkc06/2017  a50-540 v710acybersecurity10aInternet of Things10aIOT10aransomware10atrust10aWannaCry10awireless1 aWatson, Jeremy1 aMarshall, John1 aYoung, Mike1 aSmetny, Peter1 aMann, David  uhttp://timreview.ca/article/108402027nas a2200241   4500008003900000022001400039245004400053210004300097260004200140300001000182490000600192520138900198653002701587653002601614653001901640653000901659653001801668653001001686653001401696100001801710700002101728856003601749       2012                          d  a1927-032100aBuilding Trust in High-Performing Teams0 aBuilding Trust in HighPerforming Teams  aOttawabTalent First Networkc06/2012  a38-410 v23 aFacilitation of growth is more about good, trustworthy contacts than capital. Trust is a driving force for business creation, and to create a global business you need to build a team that is capable of meeting the challenge. Trust is a key factor in team building and a needed enabler for cooperation. In general, trust building is a slow process, but it can be accelerated with open interaction and good communication skills. The fast-growing and ever-changing nature of global business sets demands for cooperation and team building, especially for startup companies. Trust building needs personal knowledge and regular face-to-face interaction, but it also requires empathy, respect, and genuine listening. Trust increases communication, and rich and open communication is essential for the building of high-performing teams. Other building materials are a shared vision, clear roles and responsibilities, willingness for cooperation, and supporting and encouraging leadership. 

This study focuses on trust in high-performing teams. It asks whether it is possible to manage trust and which tools and operation models should be used to speed up the building of trust. In this article, preliminary results from the authors’ research are presented to highlight the importance of sharing critical information and having a high level of communication through constant interaction. 10ahigh-performance teams10ahigh-performing teams10asocial capital10ateam10ateam building10atrust10awellbeing1 aHakanen, Mila1 aSoudunsaari, Aki  uhttp://timreview.ca/article/567