02028nas a2200289   4500008004100000022001400041245008100055210006900136260004200205300001000247490000600257520120800263653001401471653002501485653001501510653002101525653001601546653001501562653001501577653001701592653001201609100002201621700001801643700002201661700001901683856003601702       2016                        eng d  a1927-032100aEmployment Dynamics of Australian Entrepreneurship: A Management Perspective0 aEmployment Dynamics of Australian Entrepreneurship A Management   aOttawabTalent First Networkc06/2016  a33-400 v63 aThis article attempts to draw together the literature on high-growth firms and management capability using Australian Government data from the Expanded Analytical Business Longitudinal Database. We tracked cohorts of new micro-sized firms (startups) over five years from birth. Compared with startups that had a low employment growth trajectory, medium- and high-growth micro-startups exhibited higher financial performance, higher innovation activity, and a greater propensity to seek external (debt or equity) finance. From a management perspective, medium- and high-growth startups were also significantly more likely to monitor and assess their performance across a wider range of performance indicators. High-growth micro-startups exhibited significantly higher operational process and organizational/managerial innovation, a higher likelihood of foreign ownership, and a greater demand for equity finance than medium-growth micro-startups. This data is consistent with other evidence that suggests that sustained high growth comes from superior strategic management and may suggest an ongoing role for government policy in building firm management capability in order to foster employment growth. 10aAustralia10acreative destruction10aemployment10aentrepreneurship10ahigh growth10ainnovation10amanagement10aproductivity10astartup1 aHendrickson, Luke1 aBucifal, Stan1 aBalaguer, Antonio1 aHansell, David  uhttp://timreview.ca/article/99501575nas a2200313   4500008003900000022001400039245008000053210006900133260004200202300001000244490000600254520065100260653002500911653002800936653002100964653002800985653003201013653001101045100001901056700001801075700001701093700001801110700001801128700001901146700001901165700002001184700002101204856003601225       2012                          d  a1927-032100aAn Overview of Four Issues on Technology Entrepreneurship in the TIM Review0 aOverview of Four Issues on Technology Entrepreneurship in the TI  aOttawabTalent First Networkc05/2012  a28-340 v23 aThe field of technology entrepreneurship is in its infancy when compared to other fields such as economics and management. Articles on technology entrepreneurship have been published in at least 62 journals, of which only 18 contribute to technology innovation management or entrepreneurship. Less than a handful of these 62 journals are considered to be "good" journals and none can claim a leadership position in technology entrepreneurship. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the 20 journal articles published in the February, March, April, and May 2012 issues of the Technology Innovation Management Review (TIM Review).10acreative destruction10aglobal entrepreneurship10ajournal articles10asocial entrepreneurship10atechnology entrepreneurship10atheory1 aBailetti, Tony1 aBot, Sonia, D1 aDuxbury, Tom1 aHudson, David1 aMcPhee, Chris1 aMuegge, Steven1 aWeiss, Michael1 aWells, Jonathan1 aWesterlund, Mika  uhttp://timreview.ca/article/557