02219nas a2200229   4500008004100000022001400041245008500055210006900140260004200209300001000251490000600261520152500267653001801792653001401810653002001824653002001844653002301864653002701887100002001914700001801934856003701952       2017                        eng d  a1927-032100aA Cybersecurity Risk Assessment Framework that Integrates Value-Sensitive Design0 aCybersecurity Risk Assessment Framework that Integrates ValueSen  aOttawabTalent First Networkc04/2017  a32-430 v73 aMedical devices today are more effective and connected than ever before, saving more patient lives and making healthcare practitioner’s jobs more efficient. But with this interconnectedness comes inherent concerns over increased cybersecurity vulnerabilities. Medical device cybersecurity has become an increasing concern for all relevant stakeholders including: patients, regulators, manufacturers, and healthcare practitioners. Although cybersecurity in medical devices has been covered in the literature, there is a gap in how to address cybersecurity concerns and assess risks in a way that brings value to all relevant stakeholders. In order to maximize the value created from cybersecurity risk mitigations, we review literature on the state of cybersecurity in the medical device industry, on cybersecurity risk management frameworks in the context of medical devices, and on how cybersecurity can be used as a value proposition. We then synthesize the key contributions of the literature into a framework that integrates cybersecurity value considerations for all relevant stakeholders into the risk mitigation process. This framework is subsequently applied to the hypothetical case of an insulin pump. Using this example case, we illustrate how medical device manufacturers can use the framework as a standardized method that can be applicable to medical devices at large. Our ultimate goal is to make cybersecurity risk mitigation an exploitable asset for manufacturers rather than a regulatory obligation. 10acybersecurity10aframework10amedical devices10arisk assessment10avalue propositions10avalue-sensitive design1 aAlvarenga, Aida1 aTanev, George  uhttp://timreview.ca/article/1069