@article {893,
	title = {Editorial: Insights (May 2015)},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {5},
	year = {2015},
	month = {05/2015},
	pages = {3-4},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {business ecosystems, cybersecurity, Innovation management, Internet of Things, non-practicing entities, open source policies, open source software, patent trolls, social innovation, transformative innovation},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/893},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/893},
	author = {Chris McPhee}
}
@article {755,
	title = {Editorial: Open Source Business (January 2014)},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {4},
	year = {2014},
	month = {01/2014},
	pages = {3},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {business models, collaboration, ecosystems, licensing, open data, open source business, open source software, patterns},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/755},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/755},
	author = {Chris McPhee}
}
@article {759,
	title = {TIM Lecture Series {\textendash} The Business of Open Source},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {4},
	year = {2014},
	month = {01/2014},
	pages = {28-31},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {architecture, business models, community, engagement, entrepreneurship, licensing, open source software, patterns},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/759},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/759},
	author = {Michael Weiss}
}
@article {645,
	title = {Sustainability in Open Source Software Commons: Lessons Learned from an Empirical Study of SourceForge Projects},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {3},
	year = {2013},
	month = {01/2013},
	pages = {13-19},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {In this article, we summarize a five-year US National Science Foundation funded study designed to investigate the factors that lead some open source projects to ongoing collaborative success while many others become abandoned. Our primary interest was to conduct a study that was closely representative of the population of open source software projects in the world, rather than focus on the more-often studied, high-profile successful cases. After building a large database of projects (n=174,333) and implementing a major survey of open source developers (n=1403), we were able to conduct statistical analyses to investigate over forty theoretically-based testable hypotheses. Our data firmly support what we call the conventional theory of open source software, showing that projects start small, and, in successful cases, grow slightly larger in terms of team size. We describe the {\textquotedblleft}virtuous circle{\textquotedblright} supporting conventional wisdom of open source collaboration that comes out of this analysis, and we discuss two other interesting findings related to developer motivations and how team members find each other. Each of these findings is related to the sustainability of these projects. },
	keywords = {commons, institutional analysis, internet-based collaboration, open source software, SourceForge},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/645},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/645},
	author = {Charles M. Schweik}
}
@article {632,
	title = {Editorial: Recent Research (December 2012)},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {2},
	year = {2012},
	month = {12/2012},
	pages = {3-5},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {consumer IT, electric vehicles, intellectual property, marketing strategy, neuromarketing, open source software, open source software foundations, research, Sprott School of Business, Technology Innovation Management program},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/632},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/632},
	author = {Chris McPhee}
}
@article {635,
	title = {An Enterprise Perspective on Customer Value Propositions for Open Source Software},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {2},
	year = {2012},
	month = {12/2012},
	pages = {28-36},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {Research on open source software (OSS) has examined value creation primarily from the perspective of the individuals and suppliers that create the software. The perspective of enterprise users who use and pay for OSS has been largely neglected so far. Understanding what paying customers want and how to create products and services they value is the cornerstone of any business model. Therefore, research on what enterprise users value in OSS is of paramount importance to OSS solution suppliers; it can be used to create a new customer base and sustain an existing one. 
This study examines the value of OSS as perceived by enterprise customers. Through an analysis of three literature streams (firm participation in open source software, business models, and customer value), a model on customer value creation was developed. Interviews were conducted with nine decision makers from enterprises that use OSS in operational projects. The key findings of this research are that: i) the maturity of the software determines the degree to which customers value their relationship with the supplier; ii) customers value differentiating functionality and costs savings; and iii) switching costs with OSS depend on the size, complexity, and dependencies of the software itself. This research identifies the points of value that the suppliers of OSS should focus on, and it points to the need for marketing strategies that can demonstrate this value to enterprise customers. },
	keywords = {business models, customer value creation, enterprise customers, marketing strategy, open source software, open source suppliers},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/635},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/635},
	author = {Aparna Shanker}
}
@article {510,
	title = {How Open Source Has Changed the Software Industry: Perspectives from Open Source Entrepreneurs},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {2},
	year = {2012},
	month = {01/2012},
	pages = {5-11},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {The emergence of F/LOSS (free/libre open source software) has triggered several changes in the software industry. F/LOSS has been cited as an archetypal form of open innovation; it consists of the convergence and collaboration of like-minded parties. An increasing number of software firms have taken upon this approach to link outsiders into their service development and product design. Also, software firms have been increasingly grounded their business models on user-centric and service-oriented operations.

This article describes a study that investigates these changes from the perspective of F/LOSS entrepreneurs. The findings are summarized into four issues that are critical in managing an F/LOSS business: i) dealing with organizational changes in the innovation process; ii) mastering user involvement; iii) successfully using resources; and iv) designing revenue models.},
	keywords = {entrepreneurship, narrative methodology, Open innovation, open source software, service-dominant logic},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/510},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/510},
	author = {Juho Lindman and Risto Rajala}
}
