@article {1442,
	title = {Barriers to Value Specification when Carrying out Digitalization Projects},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {11},
	year = {2021},
	month = {05/2021},
	pages = {54-64},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	chapter = {54},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {If digitalization projects aim to effectively create value for a company, one precondition is having a shared view among company staff and project members of what the "desirable" value is. However, it has been shown that few companies fully understand the value that digitalization projects can create for them, while many companies still launch digitalization projects without having gained much understanding. This contributes to the current "alarmingly" low success rate for digitalization projects. Developing effective methods to specify the desired values of digitalization projects has hence become important. One step in developing improved specification methods is to ask what the possible barriers are to improving current value specification practices. The purpose of the current study is to address this. We analyzed several digitalization projects regarding how specifications of desired project value were carried out, finding that very limited resources are spent on specifying desired values in digitalization projects, this limits project success. Likewise, there are several barriers to increasing resources for specifying desired values. Our findings contribute to understanding the development of value specification methods that aim to overcome these barriers and thus could help improve the success rate of digitalization projects.},
	keywords = {automation, digitalization, effectiveness, resource-efficiency, Value specification},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1442},
	url = {timreview.ca/article/1442},
	author = {Sten Grahn and Anna Granlund and Erik Lindhult}
}
@article {1135,
	title = {Smart Farming: Including Rights Holders for Responsible Agricultural Innovation},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {8},
	year = {2018},
	month = {02/2018},
	pages = {7-14},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {This article draws on the literature of responsible innovation to suggest concrete processes for including rights holders in the {\textquotedblleft}smart{\textquotedblright} agricultural revolution. It first draws upon historical agricultural research in Canada to highlight how productivist values drove seed innovations with particular consequences for the distribution of power in the food system. Next, the article uses document analysis to suggest that a similar value framework is motivating public investment in smart farming innovations. The article is of interest to smart farming{\textquoteright}s decision makers (from farmers to governance actors) and a broader audience {\textendash} anyone interested in engendering equity through innovation-led societal transitions.},
	keywords = {agriculture, automation, big data, machine intelligence, power, responsible innovation, smart agriculture, technological values},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1135},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1135},
	author = {Kelly Bronson}
}
@article {1065,
	title = {Editorial: Cybersecurity (April 2017)},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {7},
	year = {2017},
	month = {04/2017},
	pages = {3-4},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	keywords = {anomaly detection, automation, big data, cybersecurity, exploration, Hypponen{\textquoteright}s law, Internet of Things, IOT, legislation, medical devices, privacy, real time, risk assessment, security engineering, smart devices, value proposition, vulnerabilities},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1065},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/1065},
	author = {Chris McPhee and Michael Weiss}
}
@article {717,
	title = {On the Road to Holistic Decision Making in Adaptive Security},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {3},
	year = {2013},
	month = {08/2013},
	pages = {59-64},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {Security is a critical concern in today{\textquoteright}s software systems. Besides the interconnectivity and dynamic nature of network systems, the increasing complexity in modern software systems amplifies the complexity of IT security. This fact leaves attackers one step ahead in exploiting vulnerabilities and introducing new cyberattacks. The demand for new methodologies in addressing cybersecurity is emphasized by both private and national corporations. A practical solution to dynamically manage the high complexity of IT security is adaptive security, which facilitates analysis of the system{\textquoteright}s behaviour and hence the prevention of malicious attacks in complex systems. Systems that feature adaptive security detect and mitigate security threats at runtime with little or no administrator involvement. In these systems, decisions at runtime are balanced according to quality and performance goals. This article describes the necessity of holistic decision making in such systems and paves the road to future research.},
	keywords = {adaptive security, architecture, automation, cyberattacks, cybersecurity, game theory, holistic decision making, self-adaptive software, self-protecting software},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/717},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/717},
	author = {Mahsa Emami-Taba and Mehdi Amoui and Ladan Tahvildari}
}
