@article {1259,
	title = {Escaping the {\textquoteleft}Faster Horses{\textquoteright} Trap:  Bridging Strategic Foresight and Design-Based Innovation},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {9},
	year = {2019},
	month = {08/2019},
	pages = {30-42},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {Design thinking is inherently and invariably oriented towards the future in that all design is for products, services or events that will exist in the future, and be used by people in the future. This creates an overlap between the domains of design thinking and strategic foresight. A small but significant literature has grown up in the strategic foresight field as to how design thinking may be used to improve its processes. This paper considers the other side of the relationship: how methods from the strategic foresight field may advance design thinking, improving insight into the needs and preferences of users of tomorrow, including how contextual change may suddenly and fundamentally reshape these. A side-by-side comparison of representative models from each field is presented, and it is shown how these may be assembled together to create a foresight-informed design thinking process.},
	keywords = {design thinking,},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1259},
	url = {https://timreview.ca/article/1259},
	author = {Adam Gordon and Rene Rohrbeck and Jan Schwarz}
}
