@article {1251,
	title = {Is Joining a Business Incubator or Accelerator Always a Good Thing?},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {9},
	year = {2019},
	month = {07/2019},
	pages = {5-15},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {Business incubators and accelerators are often hailed as essential tools for fostering growth in startups. However, not only do entrepreneurs often face the question of which incubator or accelerator to join, we suggest that they should also question whether or not to join one at all. Is joining a business incubator or accelerator always a good thing? In this article, we investigate some of the negative outcomes entrepreneurs can experience when engaging with an incubator or accelerator. We apply a cross-case analysis of empirical observations from qualitative interviews with Danish and Canadian entrepreneurs to arrive at a set of recommendations that entrepreneurs should keep in mind when considering such an engagement. These points are further qualified based on informal interviews with four serial entrepreneurs.},
	keywords = {accelerator, Canada, Denmark, disadvantages, incubator, Lithuania, new venture, start-up},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1251},
	url = {https://timreview.ca/article/1251},
	author = {Kristina Lukosiute and S{\o}ren Jensen and Stoyan Tanev}
}
@article {855,
	title = {Disruptive Innovation vs Disruptive Technology: The Disruptive Potential of the Value Propositions of 3D Printing Technology Startups},
	journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review},
	volume = {4},
	year = {2014},
	month = {12/2014},
	pages = {27-36},
	publisher = {Talent First Network},
	address = {Ottawa},
	abstract = {This article describes an empirical study focusing on the classification of existing business opportunities in the 3D printing technology sector. The authors address three research questions. First, how do technology startups integrate new 3D printing technologies into specific market offers? Second, which value propositions are most attractive in terms of interest from the public and investors? Third, how does the degree of disruptiveness of value propositions relate to the degree of interest from the public and investors? The most notable finding is the link between the business traction of 3D printing technology startups and the degree of disruptiveness of their value propositions. Thus, the article provides empirical support for the conceptualization of the degree of disruptiveness of the value proposition as a metric for the evaluation of the business potential of new technology startups. },
	keywords = {3D printing technology, additive manufacturing, disruptive innovation, value proposition},
	issn = {1927-0321},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/855},
	url = {http://timreview.ca/article/855},
	author = {Finn Hahn and S{\o}ren Jensen and Stoyan Tanev}
}
